Arnoldo Diaz v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 20, 2022·No. 04-22-00526-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 20, 2022

No. 04-22-00526-CR

Arnoldo DIAZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR12132 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER On October 4, 2022, appellant filed a Motion to Substitute Counsel stating his desire to substitute Daniel De La Garza for James P. Sieloff. After consideration, we grant the motion and order James P. Sieloff withdrawn as counsel of record and Daniel De La Garza substituted as counsel in his place.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnoldo Diaz v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Arnoldo Diaz v. the State of Texas (Arnoldo Diaz v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.