Arnold v. Wisner Park Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arnold v. Wisner Park Corp.

16 A.D.2d 646, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10139

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 646 (Arnold v. Wisner Park Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Wisner Park Corp., 16 A.D.2d 646, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten [647]*647or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the attorney for defendants-respondents and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten [647]*647or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the attorney for defendants-respondents and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 646, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-wisner-park-corp-nyappdiv-1962.