Arnold v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.
72 S.E. 510, 10 Ga. App. 12, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 609
Opinion
The positive evidence proved that all the sacks of guano sold to the defendants were branded and tagged and came fully up to the requirements of the statute. The evidence to the contrary was negative in character and without 'probative value. No error of law appears, and the verdict as directed was demanded by the evidence. The case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Ilolt v. Havassa Guano Co., 114 Ga. 666 (40 S. E. 735). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co., 72 S.E. 510, 10 Ga. App. 12, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 609 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
72 S.E. 510 (Arnold v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holt v. Navassa Guano Co.
40 S.E. 735 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)