Arnold v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Arnold v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.

72 S.E. 510, 10 Ga. App. 12, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 609

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 7, 1911

Docket3258

StatusPublished

This text of 72 S.E. 510 (Arnold v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co., 72 S.E. 510, 10 Ga. App. 12, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 609 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The positive evidence proved that all the sacks of guano sold to the defendants were branded and tagged and came fully up to the requirements of the statute. The evidence to the contrary was negative in character and without 'probative value. No error of law appears, and the verdict as directed was demanded by the evidence. The case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Ilolt v. Havassa Guano Co., 114 Ga. 666 (40 S. E. 735). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

The positive evidence proved that all the sacks of guano sold to the defendants were branded and tagged and came fully up to the requirements of the statute. The evidence to the contrary was negative in character and without 'probative value. No error of law appears, and the verdict as directed was demanded by the evidence. The case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Ilolt v. Havassa Guano Co., 114 Ga. 666 (40 S. E. 735). Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 S.E. 510, 10 Ga. App. 12, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-virginia-carolina-chemical-co-gactapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack