Home/U.S. Customs Court/Arnold v. United States

Arnold v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 857, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2390
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 9, 1968
DocketR.D. 11520; Entry No. 25363
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 857 (Arnold v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 857, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2390 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Maletz, Judge:

The following appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Counsel for Plaintiff ARNOLD, Schwinn & Co. and the Assistant Attorney General for Defendant United States of America that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement set forth in “Schedule A” attached hereto consists of 'bicycle spokes more particularly described as follows:
Spokes 15G (.072") Zinc
Spokes 14G (.080") Zinc
Spokes 12G (.105") Zinc
Spokes 11G (.120") Zinc
Spokes 15Gx 17G (0.72" x .056") Swaged
Spokes 14G x 16G (0.80" x .060") Swaged
Spokes 11G x 12G (.120" x .105") Swaged
which were exported from Western Germany during the period from February 1,1963, to December 30,1965.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that bicycle spokes are specified on the Official Final List promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521, and are subject to appraisement and were appraised under the provisions of 'Section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the respective dates of exportation of the subject bicycle spokes, such or similar merchandise was freely sold and offered for sale for exportation to the United States in the principal markets of West Germany to all purchasers, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, at the following prices, packed, plus copper price premium noted on invoices, for the following respective periods of time and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise:
Merchandise Period Price U.S. Currency
8csBgnwsAZeNUePTFWkNCGOde0p0y6gp52PkFBDsTq

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 857, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-united-states-cusc-1968.