Arnold v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Arnold v. Stevens

77 S.E. 579, 139 Ga. 495, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 484

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 26, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 77 S.E. 579 (Arnold v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Stevens, 77 S.E. 579, 139 Ga. 495, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 484 (Ga. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Rise, C. J.

If the court erred in the admission of certain alleged irrelevant and immaterial evidence, it was not of such character as to require the grant of a new trial.

The court did not err in merely failing to instruct the jury as indicated in one of the grounds of the motion for new trial.

There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI