Arnold v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Arnold v. State

3 Tex. Ct. App. 437

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arnold v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Tex. Ct. App. 435 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 1878·Published

Opinion

White, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted for an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $200. He made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and he gave notice of appeal. Instead of entering into a recognizance as the law requires (Pasc. Dig., arts. 3186, 6599, 6600), he made, executed, and signed an appeal-bond with securities, which bond was approved by the clerk.

The assistant attorney general moves to dismiss the appeal for want of a recognizance. The case of Jones v. The State, 1 Texas Ct. App. 485, is conclusive of the question.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted for an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $200. He made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and he gave notice of appeal. Instead of entering into a recognizance as the law requires (Pasc. Dig., arts. 3186, 6599, 6600), he made, executed, and signed an appeal-bond with securities, which bond was approved by the clerk.

The assistant attorney general moves to dismiss the appeal for want of a recognizance. The case of Jones v. The State, 1 Texas Ct. App. 485, is conclusive of the question.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Arnold v. State, 3 Tex. Ct. App. 437 (Tex. Ct. App. 1878).

Pincite

3 Tex. Ct. App. 437 (Arnold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.