Arnold v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Arnold v. State

566 S.W.3d 669

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 5, 2019

DocketWD 81379

StatusPublished

This text of 566 S.W.3d 669 (Arnold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. State, 566 S.W.3d 669 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Randall Arnold appeals a Saline County Circuit Court judgment denying his 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Arnold pleaded guilty in October 2015 to one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Randall Arnold appeals a Saline County Circuit Court judgment denying his 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Arnold pleaded guilty in October 2015 to one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 S.W.3d 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-state-moctapp-2019.