Arnold v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Arnold v. State

566 S.W.3d 669

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 2019·No. WD 81379·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Randall Arnold appeals a Saline County Circuit Court judgment denying his 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Arnold pleaded guilty in October 2015 to one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Randall Arnold appeals a Saline County Circuit Court judgment denying his 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Arnold pleaded guilty in October 2015 to one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Arnold v. State, 566 S.W.3d 669 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

566 S.W.3d 669 (Arnold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.