Arnold v. State

137 S.E. 413, 36 Ga. App. 584, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 164
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 8, 1927
Docket17798
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 413 (Arnold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. State, 137 S.E. 413, 36 Ga. App. 584, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 164 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence connecting the accused with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial, and, therefore, the failure of the trial judge to instruct the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence was reversible error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 413, 36 Ga. App. 584, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-state-gactapp-1927.