Arnold v. State
961 So. 2d 998, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10394, 2007 WL 1931845
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arnold v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 892 So. 2d 1172 →
Opinion
Herbert Arnold seeks review of an order that denied his multi-point rule 3.850 motion. We remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing limited solely to Arnold’s claim that counsel coerced him into waiving his right to testify. See, e.g., Oisorio v. State, 676 So.2d [999]*9991363, 1364-65 (Fla.1996); Barrientos v. State, 929 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. State, 961 So. 2d 998, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10394, 2007 WL 1931845 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
961 So. 2d 998 (Arnold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oisorio v. State
676 So. 2d 1363 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Barrientos v. State
929 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)