Arnold v. State

850 So. 2d 625, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11036, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1700
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 23, 2003
DocketNo. 2D02-936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 850 So. 2d 625 (Arnold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. State, 850 So. 2d 625, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11036, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1700 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Gary Arnold appeals from the order revoking his probation. The State correctly concedes that the January 31, 2002, order revoking Arnold’s probation should be vacated.1 Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate the January 31, 2002, order finding Arnold guilty of violation of probation and revoking his probation in case numbers 96-2661 and 96-2662.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Revenue v. Hinnerschietz
850 So. 2d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
850 So. 2d 625, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11036, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.