Arnold v. Spring
This text of 158 A.D. 889 (Arnold v. Spring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the judgment appealed from is erroneous in the following particulars: First, plaintiff is not entitled to a lien for the value of the undelivered stove wood; second, plaintiff’s lien attaches to all the wood and logs remaining upon the plaintiff’s lands, and is hot limited to an undivided one-half thereof; third, plaintiff’s lien is limited in amount to the value of said wood and logs less the expense incurred by defendants in cutting and piling the same. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D. 889, 143 N.Y.S. 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-spring-nyappdiv-1913.