Arnold v. Sergeant
1 Root 86
This text of 1 Root 86 (Arnold v. Sergeant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arnold v. Sergeant, 1 Root 86 (Colo. Ct. App. 1783).
Opinion
The defendant plead in abatement — That Amos Arnold one of the plaintiffs was an alien enemy, etc. which plea was judged sufficient. Upon which Nathan Arnold, the other plaintiff paid the cost, and moved to amend his writ by striking out the name of Amos Arnold; which was allowed by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-sergeant-connsuperct-1783.