Arnold v. Sauer

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Arnold v. Sauer

78 So. 442, 143 La. 187, 1918 La. LEXIS 1607

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 1, 1918

DocketNo. 21312

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 78 So. 442 (Arnold v. Sauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Sauer, 78 So. 442, 143 La. 187, 1918 La. LEXIS 1607 (La. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

The property of defendant, Mrs. Lillian Thompson Sauer, was assessed in 1905, to “Mrs. William Thompson,” and was sold to plaintiffs in 1906 under said assessment. Plaintiffs have brought the present suit to confirm the tax title. No notice of delinquency was served on defendant, hence the tax sale was a nullity; and as she has been continuously in the actual possession of the property, prescription cannot be invoked against her.

The judgment dismissing the suit is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PROVOSTY, J.

The property of defendant, Mrs. Lillian Thompson Sauer, was assessed in 1905, to “Mrs. William Thompson,” and was sold to plaintiffs in 1906 under said assessment. Plaintiffs have brought the present suit to confirm the tax title. No notice of delinquency was served on defendant, hence the tax sale was a nullity; and as she has been continuously in the actual possession of the property, prescription cannot be invoked against her.

The judgment dismissing the suit is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 So. 442, 143 La. 187, 1918 La. LEXIS 1607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-sauer-la-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack