Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 491
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedMarch 6, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 491 (Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co., 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 491 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Opinion

SMITH, J.

We do not think the evidence objected to by the plaintiff in error was erroneously admitted on the question of damages, and the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-rudolph-wurlitzer-co-ohiocirct-1909.