Home/Ohio Circuit Courts/Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.

Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 491
Ohio Circuit Courts·Decided March 6, 1909·Published

Opinion

SMITH, J.

We do not think the evidence objected to by the plaintiff in error was erroneously admitted on the question of damages, and the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co., 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 491 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 491 (Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.