Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.
12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 309, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 272
This text of 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 309 (Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arnold v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co., 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 309, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 272 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).
Opinion
We do not think the evidence objected to -by the plaintiff in error was erroneously admitted on the question of damages, and the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 309, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-rudolph-wurlitzer-co-ohcircthamilton-1909.