Arnold v. Northeastern Pennsylvania Telephone Co.

97 A. 1038, 253 Pa. 23, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 776
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 13, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 341
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 A. 1038 (Arnold v. Northeastern Pennsylvania Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. Northeastern Pennsylvania Telephone Co., 97 A. 1038, 253 Pa. 23, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 776 (Pa. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below denying the motion of defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landry v. Seattle Port Angeles & Western Railway Co.
171 P. 231 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
Ramon v. Interstate Utilities Co.
170 P. 88 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A. 1038, 253 Pa. 23, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-northeastern-pennsylvania-telephone-co-pa-1916.