Arnold v. Northeastern Pennsylvania Telephone Co.
97 A. 1038, 253 Pa. 23, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 776
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below denying the motion of defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. Northeastern Pennsylvania Telephone Co., 97 A. 1038, 253 Pa. 23, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 776 (Pa. 1916).
97 A. 1038 (Arnold v. Northeastern Pennsylvania Telephone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Landry v. Seattle Port Angeles & Western Railway Co.
171 P. 231 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
Ramon v. Interstate Utilities Co.
170 P. 88 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)