Arnold v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hosiery Co.
28 N.Y.S. 638, 76 Hun 15
Opinion
The question of fact upon which this action depends was properly determined at special term. The opinion there delivered is fully sustained by the evidence. We have examined the •numerous exceptions, and find none that require discussion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hosiery Co., 28 N.Y.S. 638, 76 Hun 15 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
28 N.Y.S. 638 (Arnold v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hosiery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bareham & McFarland, Inc. v. Kane
228 A.D. 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)