Arnold v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hosiery Co.
28 N.Y.S. 638, 76 Hun 15
This text of 28 N.Y.S. 638 (Arnold v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hosiery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arnold v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hosiery Co., 28 N.Y.S. 638, 76 Hun 15 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
The question of fact upon which this action depends was properly determined at special term. The opinion there delivered is fully sustained by the evidence. We have examined the •numerous exceptions, and find none that require discussion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bareham & McFarland, Inc. v. Kane
228 A.D. 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 N.Y.S. 638, 76 Hun 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-norfolk-new-brunswick-hosiery-co-nysupct-1894.