Arnold v. Metropolitan Elevated R. Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Arnold v. Metropolitan Elevated R. Co.

42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided January 11, 1892·Published

Opinion

McAdam, J.

The judgment restrains the defendants from maintaining the-elevated railway structure in front of the premises Mo. 875 Sixth avenue, unless the defendants, within a time specified, pay the plaintiff $2,000 and interest, for a release of the easement, and $880 as and for past damages for six years-preceding the commencement of the action. The evidence satisfactorily sustains the findings of the referee and warrants the judgment rendered. _ No-errors were committed during the trial which require a reversal, and the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAdam, J.

The judgment restrains the defendants from maintaining the-elevated railway structure in front of the premises Mo. 875 Sixth avenue, unless the defendants, within a time specified, pay the plaintiff $2,000 and interest, for a release of the easement, and $880 as and for past damages for six years-preceding the commencement of the action. The evidence satisfactorily sustains the findings of the referee and warrants the judgment rendered. _ No-errors were committed during the trial which require a reversal, and the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Arnold v. Metropolitan Elevated R. Co., 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958 (Arnold v. Metropolitan Elevated R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.