Arnold v. Maudlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Arnold v. Maudlin

6 Blackf. 187

DecidedMay 15, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Blackf. 187 (Arnold v. Maudlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Maudlin, 6 Blackf. 187 (Ind. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

Blackford, J.

This was an action of trespass. Three counts; the first of which is for breaking the close; the second and third for an assault and battery. General demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the defendants.

The only objection made to the declaration is, that there is a misjoinder of counts. This objection is without foundation. Several trespasses, as assault and battery, false imprisonment, [199]*199and trespasses upon property either real or personal, may all be joined. Gould on Plead., 212.

O. G. Dunn, for the plaintiff. J. W. Payne, for the defendants;

Per Curiam.—The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackford, J.

This was an action of trespass. Three counts; the first of which is for breaking the close; the second and third for an assault and battery. General demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the defendants.

The only objection made to the declaration is, that there is a misjoinder of counts. This objection is without foundation. Several trespasses, as assault and battery, false imprisonment, [199]*199and trespasses upon property either real or personal, may all be joined. Gould on Plead., 212.

O. G. Dunn, for the plaintiff. J. W. Payne, for the defendants;

Per Curiam.—The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Blackf. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-maudlin-ind-1842.