Arnold v. Marles

Fourth Circuit

Arnold v. Marles

35 F. App'x 58

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2002·No. Nos. 01-8114, 02-6168·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Guy Arnold appeals the district court orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petitions in these consolidated cases. We find Arnold’s appeals to be moot. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals. Further, we deny Arnold’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Guy Arnold appeals the district court orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petitions in these consolidated cases. We find Arnold’s appeals to be moot. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals. Further, we deny Arnold’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Arnold v. Marles, 35 F. App'x 58 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

35 F. App'x 58 (Arnold v. Marles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related