Arnold v. M. J. Daley Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arnold v. M. J. Daley Co.

230 A.D. 782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 782 (Arnold v. M. J. Daley Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. M. J. Daley Co., 230 A.D. 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order - and order on reargument reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for a comm ission for the examination without the State of the defendant, by Michael J. Daley, its president, and of Michael J. Daley as a witness for the plaintiff, granted, without costs. The denial of the relief sought was an erroneous exercise of discretion amounting to an abuse thereof. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order - and order on reargument reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for a comm ission for the examination without the State of the defendant, by Michael J. Daley, its president, and of Michael J. Daley as a witness for the plaintiff, granted, without costs. The denial of the relief sought was an erroneous exercise of discretion amounting to an abuse thereof. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-m-j-daley-co-nyappdiv-1930.