Arnold v. . Lanier

4 N.C. 143
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 N.C. 143 (Arnold v. . Lanier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. . Lanier, 4 N.C. 143 (N.C. 1814).

Opinion

The act of 1799, ch. 18, sec. 5, declares that no action of detinue or trover, or action of trespass, where property, either personal or real, is in contest, and such action of trespass is not merely vindictive, shall abate by the death of either party. This is an action of trespass, though not vi et armis, and the passions and feelings have no concern. It is, in substance, to recover for an act done by the defendant's testator, whereby he has been made richer and the present plaintiff poorer.

Wherefore, we are all of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment, and that scire facias be awarded against the testator's heirs and devisees.

Cited: Molton v. Miller, 10 N.C. 498; Helme v. Sanders, ib., 565;Butner v. Keelhn, 51 N.C. 61.

(144)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helme v. . Sanders
10 N.C. 563 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1825)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.C. 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-lanier-nc-1814.