Arnold v. Kemp
735 N.W.2d 259
This text of 735 N.W.2d 259 (Arnold v. Kemp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arnold v. Kemp, 735 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
James Richard ARNOLD, and Carol Arnold, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
Dennis R. KEMP, and Michael D. Kemp, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Dale Arnold, William C. Dunn, and Iola C. Dunn, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
James Richard Arnold, and Carol Arnold, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants Third-Party Defendants-Appellees,
v.
Dennis R. Kemp, and Michael D. Kemp, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
William D. Dunn, and Iola C. Dunn, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
James Richard Arnold, and Carol Arnold, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants Third-Party Defendants-Appellees,
v.
Dennis R. Kemp, and Michael D. Kemp, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Dale Arnold, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and
William C. Dunn, and Iola C. Dunn, Third-Party Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*260 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Brickey
735 N.W.2d 259 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
735 N.W.2d 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-kemp-mich-2007.