Arnold v. Kemp
735 N.W.2d 259
Opinion
James Richard ARNOLD, and Carol Arnold, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
Dennis R. KEMP, and Michael D. Kemp, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Dale Arnold, William C. Dunn, and Iola C. Dunn, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
James Richard Arnold, and Carol Arnold, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants Third-Party Defendants-Appellees,
v.
Dennis R. Kemp, and Michael D. Kemp, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
William D. Dunn, and Iola C. Dunn, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
James Richard Arnold, and Carol Arnold, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants Third-Party Defendants-Appellees,
v.
Dennis R. Kemp, and Michael D. Kemp, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Dale Arnold, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and
William C. Dunn, and Iola C. Dunn, Third-Party Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*260 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. Kemp, 735 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2007).
735 N.W.2d 259 (Arnold v. Kemp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Brickey
735 N.W.2d 259 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)