Arnold v. Jarrell

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 25, 2003
• Docket: 02-7829
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7829

JAMES GUY ARNOLD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOSHUA L. JARRELL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01- 3570)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Guy Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Linda S. Woolf, Kristen Nichole Nesbitt, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & GRAY, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

James Guy Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Arnold v. Jarrell, No. CA-01-3570

(D. Md. Nov. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED