Arnold v. Jarrell

Fourth Circuit

Arnold v. Jarrell

61 F. App'x 79

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 25, 2003·No. No. 02-7829·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Guy Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Arnold v. Jarrell, No. CA-01-3570 (D.Md. Nov. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Guy Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Arnold v. Jarrell, No. CA-01-3570 (D.Md. Nov. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Arnold v. Jarrell, 61 F. App'x 79 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

61 F. App'x 79 (Arnold v. Jarrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related