Arnold v. Hickman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Arnold v. Hickman

6 Va. 15

DecidedNovember 1, 1817

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 15 (Arnold v. Hickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Hickman, 6 Va. 15 (Va. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Roane

delivered the Court’s opinion.

The Court affirms the judgment of the Superior Court affirming that of the County Court, on this ground;— that the invalidity of the judgment agreed to be assigned, does not appear to have been in contemplation of the ap-' pellant at the time of the contract, but that all his objections to engaging in that contract had relation only to the insolvency of the Jacksons’,—and on the further ground, that his assent to the contract, thus understood, was given when he was not disabled, from contracting, by intoxication or otherwise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Roane

delivered the Court’s opinion.

The Court affirms the judgment of the Superior Court affirming that of the County Court, on this ground;— that the invalidity of the judgment agreed to be assigned, does not appear to have been in contemplation of the ap-' pellant at the time of the contract, but that all his objections to engaging in that contract had relation only to the insolvency of the Jacksons’,—and on the further ground, that his assent to the contract, thus understood, was given when he was not disabled, from contracting, by intoxication or otherwise.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-hickman-va-1817.