Arnold v. Fola Coal Co.

474 F. App'x 276
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 25, 2012
DocketNo. 11-2349
StatusPublished

This text of 474 F. App'x 276 (Arnold v. Fola Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. Fola Coal Co., 474 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie G. Arnold appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his age discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va.Code Ann. §§ 5-11-1 to 5-11-20 (LexisNexis 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Arnold v. Fola Coal Co., LLC, No. 2:10—cv-00908, 2011 WL 5358717 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5-11-1
Virginia § 5-11-1
§ 5-11-1
West Virginia § 5-11-1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F. App'x 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-fola-coal-co-ca4-2012.