Arnold v. Fola Coal Co.

Fourth Circuit

Arnold v. Fola Coal Co.

474 F. App'x 276

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2012·No. No. 11-2349·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie G. Arnold appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his age discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va.Code Ann. §§ 5-11-1 to 5-11-20 (LexisNexis 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Arnold v. Fola Coal Co., LLC, No. 2:10—cv-00908, 2011 WL 5358717 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie G. Arnold appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his age discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va.Code Ann. §§ 5-11-1 to 5-11-20 (LexisNexis 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Arnold v. Fola Coal Co., LLC, No. 2:10—cv-00908, 2011 WL 5358717 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Arnold v. Fola Coal Co., 474 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 276 (Arnold v. Fola Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related