Arnold v. Fola Coal Co.
This text of 474 F. App'x 276 (Arnold v. Fola Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronnie G. Arnold appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his age discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va.Code Ann. §§ 5-11-1 to 5-11-20 (LexisNexis 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Arnold v. Fola Coal Co., LLC, No. 2:10—cv-00908, 2011 WL 5358717 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-fola-coal-co-ca4-2012.