Arnold v. Dexter

1 F. Cas. 1179, 4 Mason C.C. 122
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island·Decided November 15, 1825·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STORY, Circuit Justice.

I think the evi-■denee sufficient to establish a new promise, and to take the case out of the statute of limitations. The defendant did not deny the validity of the note, but, on the contrary, admitted it to be as good as money. How could this • be, unless he meant that the money was still due on it, and he was responsible to pay it? I will leave the facts, however, to be passed upon by the jury.

Verdict for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Dexter, 1 F. Cas. 1179, 4 Mason C.C. 122 (circtdri 1825).

1 F. Cas. 1179 (Arnold v. Dexter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dinsmore v. Dinsmore
21 Me. 433 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1842)