Arnold v. Dennis.
This text of 42 S.E. 552 (Arnold v. Dennis.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case, made up by the counsel, we are unable to make a decision for want of a sufficient statement- of the facts. The plaintiffs allege a tenancy in common with the defendants, and pray fox a sale for partition. The defendants plead sole seizin. There is no evidence sent up, and the statement of the case fails to state in what relation the parties stand to each other or to the testator, or to the devisee, Nancy E. Thomas, named in the seventh item of the will, the construction of Avhicli seems, to have been the object of the appeal. The ease must be remanded for a fuller statement of the- facts to be brought out on a new trial.
New Trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 552, 131 N.C. 114, 1902 N.C. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-dennis-nc-1902.