Arnold v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 759, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2308
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided September 30, 1925·No. Docket No. 2314.·Published

Opinion

[761] OPINION.

Graupner:

This appeal is based upon the same transactions in stock as -were involved in the Appeals of W. G. Schroth and John G. Schroth, 2 B. T. A. 169. Those appeals were submitted on the pleadings. In the present appeal counsel stipulated the major facts and oral evidence was offered, but there is nothing in either the stipulation or the evidence to convince us that ive should modify our decision in the two appeals which have been decided.

ARundell not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 759, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2308 (bta 1925).

2 B.T.A. 759 (Arnold v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schroth v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 169 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)
Appeal of Estate Arnold
2 B.T.A. 759 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)