Arnold v. Comm of PA Transp

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 2007
Docket05-5037
StatusPublished

This text of Arnold v. Comm of PA Transp (Arnold v. Comm of PA Transp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. Comm of PA Transp, (3d Cir. 2007).

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

3-7-2007

Arnold v. Comm of PA Transp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-5037

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

Recommended Citation "Arnold v. Comm of PA Transp" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1393. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1393

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT March 2, 2007

Nos. 05-5037 & 05-5227

AUGUST W. ARNOLD

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al

Michael Baker Corporation, Appellant in 05-5037

Tribune Review Publishing Company, Intervenor/Appellant in 05-5227

( D. C. No.03-cv-638 )

PRESENT: SMITH, ROTH, Circuit Judges and YOHN*, District Judge

Letter Motion by Tribune Review Publishing, Intervenor/Appellant in No. 05-5227 to Motion to Amend the Opinion.

Carolyn Hicks, Case Manager 267-299-4926

Answer due 3/12/07.

*Hon. William H. Yohn Jr., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvanina. ORDER

The foregoing Letter Motion by Tribune Review Publishing, Intervenor/Appellant in No. 05-5227 to Motion to Amend the Opinion is GRANTED. Because the names of counsel were inadvertently switched, it is further ORDERED that the Opinion filed February 20, 2007 shall be AMENDED as follows:

The designation of counsel for the parties shall be amended as follows:

Counsel for Appellant/Cross Appellee is :

Kim M. Watterson (Argued) Efrem M. Grail Joseph F. Rodkey, Jr. Reed Smith LLP 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219

1 Counsel for Appellee/Cross Appellant is:

Ronald D. Barber (Argued) H. Yale Gutnick Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, P.C. Four Gateway Center, Suite 2200 444 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222

By the Court,

/s/ D. Brooks Smith Circuit Judge Dated: March 7, 2006

CH/cc: Ronald D. Barber, Esq. Efrem M. Grail, Esq. Kim M. Watterson, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Arnold v. Comm of PA Transp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-comm-of-pa-transp-ca3-2007.