Arnold v. Charter Communications
297 S.W.3d 660, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1686, 2009 WL 4278957
Opinion
ORDER
Kathleen Arnold appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision to deny her unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. Charter Communications, 297 S.W.3d 660, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1686, 2009 WL 4278957 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
297 S.W.3d 660 (Arnold v. Charter Communications) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cuskic v. True Manufacturing
297 S.W.3d 660 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)