Arnold v. Board of Regents

West Virginia Court of Claims

Arnold v. Board of Regents

13 Ct. Cl. 207

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedMay 1, 1980

DocketCC-79-715

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 207 (Arnold v. Board of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Board of Regents, 13 Ct. Cl. 207 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based on the allegations of the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of the sum of $38.00 for damage to her bowling ball which occurred on September 18, 1979, when claimant was bowling with the Faculty and Staff Bowling League at Glenville State College in Glenville, West Virginia. The ball became lodged in the automatic return system and was found to be damaged when removed.

In its Answer, the respondent acknowledges the validity of the claim as evidenced by correspondence from the President and the Business Manager of Glenville State College. As funds remained in respondent’s appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which this claim could have been paid, the Court hereby makes an award to the claimant in the amount requested.

Award of $38.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based on the allegations of the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of the sum of $38.00 for damage to her bowling ball which occurred on September 18, 1979, when claimant was bowling with the Faculty and Staff Bowling League at Glenville State College in Glenville, West Virginia. The ball became lodged in the automatic return system and was found to be damaged when removed.

In its Answer, the respondent acknowledges the validity of the claim as evidenced by correspondence from the President and the Business Manager of Glenville State College. As funds remained in respondent’s appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which this claim could have been paid, the Court hereby makes an award to the claimant in the amount requested.

Award of $38.00.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ct. Cl. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-board-of-regents-wvctcl-1980.