Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker

199 N.E. 692, 269 N.Y. 603, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 891
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be modified to the extent of requiring Kate Darling Bertolini to deposit additional securities sufficient to yield sixty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the deficiency in income of the Annie R. Tinker obligation, and to pay sixty-five per cent of *606 fifty per cent of the arrears in income arising under that obligation and the Annie R. Tinker Memorial Home is required to deposit additional securities sufficient to yield thirty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the deficiency in income and to pay thirty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the arrears in income.

The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be modified in accordance with this opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. (See 269 N. Y. 676.)

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran, and Finch, JJ., concur. Crouch, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker, 199 N.E. 692, 269 N.Y. 603, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 891 (N.Y. 1935).

199 N.E. 692 (Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold v. Bertolini
200 N.E. 53 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)