Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker

199 N.E. 692, 269 N.Y. 603, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 891
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 13, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 N.E. 692 (Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. Bertolini, Tinker, 199 N.E. 692, 269 N.Y. 603, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 891 (N.Y. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be modified to the extent of requiring Kate Darling Bertolini to deposit additional securities sufficient to yield sixty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the deficiency in income of the Annie R. Tinker obligation, and to pay sixty-five per cent of *606 fifty per cent of the arrears in income arising under that obligation and the Annie R. Tinker Memorial Home is required to deposit additional securities sufficient to yield thirty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the deficiency in income and to pay thirty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the arrears in income.

The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be modified in accordance with this opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. (See 269 N. Y. 676.)

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran, and Finch, JJ., concur. Crouch, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. Bertolini
200 N.E. 53 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.E. 692, 269 N.Y. 603, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-bertolini-tinker-ny-1935.