Arnold v. Attaway
35 S.W. 646, 89 Tex. 506, 1896 Tex. LEXIS 391
Opinion
We refuse the application in this case, but our conclusion is based upon different grounds from those announced in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. Whether the propositions, upon which the judgment of that court is founded, are sustainable, we ,are not prepared to say, without further consideration. We have not time to devote to the solution of questions which we deem -not necessary to the decision of the case.
Writ of error refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. Attaway, 35 S.W. 646, 89 Tex. 506, 1896 Tex. LEXIS 391 (Tex. 1896).
35 S.W. 646 (Arnold v. Attaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pease v. State ex rel. Sutherland
228 S.W. 269 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Pease v. State
228 S.W. 269 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Childress v. Robinson
161 S.W. 78 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)