Arnold v. Ash

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Arnold v. Ash

133 N.W. 1132, 116 Minn. 531

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 1, 1911

DocketNos. 17,380—(25)

StatusPublished

This text of 133 N.W. 1132 (Arnold v. Ash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Ash, 133 N.W. 1132, 116 Minn. 531 (Mich. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The plaintiff obtained judgment by default against the Northern Security Company. The defendant company duly mov'ed the court in which the judgment was entered for an order vacating the judgment, and for permission to appear and defend in the action and to serve and file its answer therein. The plaintiff appeared in opposition to the motion. The court, after hearing, granted the motion. The answer on its face states a meritorious defense. The showing made was in all respects sufficient to sustain the order of the trial judge granting the motion.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The plaintiff obtained judgment by default against the Northern Security Company. The defendant company duly mov'ed the court in which the judgment was entered for an order vacating the judgment, and for permission to appear and defend in the action and to serve and file its answer therein. The plaintiff appeared in opposition to the motion. The court, after hearing, granted the motion. The answer on its face states a meritorious defense. The showing made was in all respects sufficient to sustain the order of the trial judge granting the motion.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 N.W. 1132, 116 Minn. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-ash-minn-1911.