Arnold v. Arnold

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 374
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arnold v. Arnold. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Ohio St. 416
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 1923·No. No. 18139·Published

Opinion

MARSHALL, C. J.

1. In pleading a cause of action where the relief sought may be predicated upon one or more grounds the pleader should allege operative facts and need not characterize the facts alleged or classify them under the respective nominal grounds of such relief.

2. An action for divorce, though more than one of the statutory causes may be relied upon, constitutes a single cause of action and operative facts may support more than one of the causes relied upon. In such event it is not necessary to classify the allegations under the respective statutory causes' and even though certain allegations more particularly applicable to one statutory cause may be wholly insufficient to sustain that cause independently of the other causes, such allegations are pertinent and may be considered for the purpose of lending weight and color to other causes more particularly relied upon.

Judgment reversed.

Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Jones, J., concurs in the judgment. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Arnold, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 374 (Ohio 1923).

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 374 (Arnold v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.