Arnold v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Georgia

Arnold v. Arnold

377 S.E.2d 856, 259 Ga. 150, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 161

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 6, 1989

Docket46354

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 377 S.E.2d 856 (Arnold v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. Arnold, 377 S.E.2d 856, 259 Ga. 150, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 161 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Arnold v. Arnold, 189 Ga. App. 101 (375 SE2d 225) (1988) to consider whether the family immunity doctrine is applicable. We hold that it is not and we affirm.

“Every person may recover for torts committed to himself, his wife, his child, his ward, or his servant.” OCGA § 51-1-9. Emancipated children may sue their parents and parents may sue their emancipated children. Davis v. Cox, 131 Ga. App. 611, 614 (206 SE2d 655) (1974). The appellant is an emancipated child who is being sued by a sibling. 1 The doctrine of family immunity is not involved.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

1

Actions between siblings who are minors have been uniformly allowed. Prosser & Keeton on Torts (5th ed. 1984) § 122 at 906.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI