Arnold v. Arnold

377 S.E.2d 856, 259 Ga. 150, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 161
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 6, 1989·No. 46354·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Smith, Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Arnold v. Arnold, 189 Ga. App. 101 (375 SE2d 225) (1988) to consider whether the family immunity doctrine is applicable. We hold that it is not and we affirm.

“Every person may recover for torts committed to himself, his wife, his child, his ward, or his servant.” OCGA § 51-1-9. Emancipated children may sue their parents and parents may sue their emancipated children. Davis v. Cox, 131 Ga. App. 611, 614 (206 SE2d 655) (1974). The appellant is an emancipated child who is being sued by a sibling. 1 The doctrine of family immunity is not involved.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.
1

Actions between siblings who are minors have been uniformly allowed. Prosser & Keeton on Torts (5th ed. 1984) § 122 at 906.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Arnold, 377 S.E.2d 856, 259 Ga. 150, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 161 (Ga. 1989).

377 S.E.2d 856 (Arnold v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Queen v. Carey
435 S.E.2d 264 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Newsome v. Department of Human Resources
405 S.E.2d 61 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Arnold v. Arnold
397 S.E.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Bennett v. Bennett
390 S.E.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
SOUTHEASTERN FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Chaney
381 S.E.2d 747 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1989)
Stepho v. Allstate Insurance
382 S.E.2d 154 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)