Arnold v. Arnold

113 S.E. 798, 154 Ga. 195, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 330
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 19, 1922
DocketNo. 2850
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 798 (Arnold v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. Arnold, 113 S.E. 798, 154 Ga. 195, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 330 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. “ No note or memorandum in writing is necessary to charge either the administrator or purchaser at any administrator’s sale.” Green v. Freeman, 126 Ga. 274 (55 S. E. 45, 7 Ann. Cas. 1069)Civil Code, § 6071.

2. A purchase by an administrator at his own sale of the land of his intestate is voidable at the option of the heirs at law, and it is immaterial whether the purchase is made by the administrator in his own name or through the medium of another; but an administrator whf> is an heir at law of his intestate, and as such has an interest in the property sold, may purchase at the sale of the property of the estate, provided ■ he is guilty of no fraud, and the property is exposed for sale in the ordinary mode and under circumstances to command the best price. Randolph v. Vails, 180 Ala. 82 (60 So. 159); Wetumpka Bank v. Walkley, 169 Ala. 648 (53 So. 830); Calloway v. Gilmer, 36 Ala. 354; Wheeler’s Est., 11 Del. Ch. 469 (101 Atl. 865); 24 C. J. 635, § 1591, note 62.

3. Where an administrator employs another to bid in lands of an intestate at a sale conducted by him as such administrator, such agent being instructed by the administrator not to exceed a named price per acre, but through a misunderstanding of his instructions such agent bids off the lands at a higher price per acre, the mistake of the agent will be imputed to his principal, and will not furnish a ground for setting aside the sale on the ground of mistake.

4. The foregoing rulings are controlling in the case, and the judge did not err in directing the verdict, upon any ground taken.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beclc, P. J., dissenting. W. W. Stark, J. W. Arnold, and John J. Strickland for plaintiffs. Gordon & Gordon, Clarence TS. Adams, West & West, and Berry T. Moseley, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cromer v. Cromer
149 S.E.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Anderson v. Miller
94 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Adler v. Adler
75 S.E.2d 578 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Goldin v. Smith
64 S.E.2d 57 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Bank of Tifton v. Bryan
22 S.E.2d 467 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Allen v. Bemis
19 S.E.2d 516 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Head v. Scruggs
173 S.E. 113 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Gormley v. Askew
170 S.E. 674 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Weeks v. McInvale
165 S.E. 33 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Lewis v. Lewis
158 S.E. 364 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Henderson v. Lott
136 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Melton v. Phœnix Mutual Life Ins.
128 S.E. 900 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Robinson v. Smith
125 S.E. 593 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Bryson v. Miraglia
124 S.E. 167 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 798, 154 Ga. 195, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-arnold-ga-1922.