Arnold v. Arnold
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
RYAN ARNOLD,1 § § Petitioner Below, § No. 490, 2025 Appellant, § § Court Below—Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § JACKIE ARNOLD, § File No. CN24-05285 § Petition No. 24-23729 Respondent Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: May 15, 2026 Decided: July 17, 2026
Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
PER CURIAM:
ORDER
After consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we
conclude that the Family Court’s judgment should be affirmed on the basis of the
court’s decisions and orders dated July 29, 2025; August 22, 2025; November 7,
2025; and December 2, 2025. The appellee has moved for attorneys’ fees, arguing
that the appeal is frivolous. Under Rule 20(f), the Court may award costs and
reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, to an appellee in a frivolous appeal.
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). After consideration of the appellant’s arguments on appeal and the record, we
conclude that this appeal is not frivolous.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family
Court is AFFIRMED. The appellee’s motion for attorneys’ fees is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. Arnold (Arnold v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.