Arnold v. Arnold

564 So. 2d 920, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 468, 1990 WL 116417
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 1, 1990·No. 89-769·Published

Opinion

MADDOX, Justice.

This is a pro se appeal1 by an inmate who sought to intervene in a wrongful death action filed by his wife, as adminis-tratrix of the estate of his late son, who apparently was killed in a fire in their trailer home.

The record before us is incomplete, and the appellant’s brief is inadequate, but apparently the appellant is claiming that he had a statutory right to intervene in the wrongful death action filed by his wife as administratrix.2 The record before us does not show that the trial judge committed reversible error in denying appellant’s request to intervene in the lawsuit; therefore, based on the authority of Dearmon v. Dearmon, 492 So.2d 1004 (Ala.1986), we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Arnold, 564 So. 2d 920, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 468, 1990 WL 116417 (Ala. 1990).

564 So. 2d 920 (Arnold v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dearmon v. Dearmon
492 So. 2d 1004 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)
Thrasher v. Bartlett
424 So. 2d 605 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1982)