Arnold v. Arnold
This text of 564 So. 2d 920 (Arnold v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a pro se appeal1 by an inmate who sought to intervene in a wrongful death action filed by his wife, as adminis-tratrix of the estate of his late son, who apparently was killed in a fire in their trailer home.
The record before us is incomplete, and the appellant’s brief is inadequate, but apparently the appellant is claiming that he had a statutory right to intervene in the wrongful death action filed by his wife as administratrix.2 The record before us does not show that the trial judge committed reversible error in denying appellant’s request to intervene in the lawsuit; therefore, based on the authority of Dearmon v. Dearmon, 492 So.2d 1004 (Ala.1986), we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
564 So. 2d 920, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 468, 1990 WL 116417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-arnold-ala-1990.