Arnold Oglesby and Virginia E. Oglesby v. Ralston Purina Company
This text of 385 F.2d 416 (Arnold Oglesby and Virginia E. Oglesby v. Ralston Purina Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The District Court directed a verdict for appellee in a suit for the balance due on a contract whereunder feed was sold to appellants and turkeys were either sold to or financed for appellants. We find the errors assigned to be without merit. Specifically, the construction of the contract by the court with respect to feed prices was not erroneous nor did the court err in excluding the proferred hearsay testimony and documentary evidence relating to the condition of the turkeys.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
385 F.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-oglesby-and-virginia-e-oglesby-v-ralston-purina-company-ca5-1967.