Arnold Oglesby and Virginia E. Oglesby v. Ralston Purina Company
385 F.2d 416
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 31, 1967·No. 24455_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The District Court directed a verdict for appellee in a suit for the balance due on a contract whereunder feed was sold to appellants and turkeys were either sold to or financed for appellants. We find the errors assigned to be without merit. Specifically, the construction of the contract by the court with respect to feed prices was not erroneous nor did the court err in excluding the proferred hearsay testimony and documentary evidence relating to the condition of the turkeys.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold Oglesby and Virginia E. Oglesby v. Ralston Purina Company, 385 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1967).
385 F.2d 416 (Arnold Oglesby and Virginia E. Oglesby v. Ralston Purina Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Ralph Shue
385 F.2d 416 (Fourth Circuit, 1968)