Arnold, L. v. Kaposy, R.
This text of Arnold, L. v. Kaposy, R. (Arnold, L. v. Kaposy, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
LARRY ARNOLD, ADMINISTRATOR OF : No. 473 WAL 2016 THE ESTATE OF ERIC ARNOLD, : DECEASED, ON BEHALF OF THE : ESTATE OF ERIC ARNOLD, DECEASED, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from LARRY ARNOLD, ADMINISTRATOR OF : the Order of the Superior Court THE ESTATE OF ERIC ARNOLD, : DECEASED, ON BEHALF OF THE NEXT : OF KIN OF ERIC ARNOLD, DECEASED, : AND LARRY ARNOLD, IN HIS OWN : RIGHT, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : RICHARD KAPOSY; AND/OR RICHARD : KAPOSY D/B/A TREEMAN : LANDSCAPING; AND/OR RICHARD : KAPOSY D/B/A COUNTRY BOYZ : CUTTING CITY TREES; AND/OR : RICHARD KAPOSY D/B/A COUNTRY : BOYZ TREE SERVICE; DUQUESNE : LIGHT COMPANY; KAYLA WELLER; : AND/OR MATTHEW WELLER, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arnold, L. v. Kaposy, R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-l-v-kaposy-r-pa-2017.