Arnold Franklin Horton v. State
This text of Arnold Franklin Horton v. State (Arnold Franklin Horton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBERS 13-10-00187-CR AND 13-10-00188-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
ARNOLD FRANKLIN HORTON, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 163rd District Court
of Orange County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Arnold Franklin Horton, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the cases, we grant appellant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeals. Having dismissed the appeals at appellant's request, no motions for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandates will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the
2nd day of December, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arnold Franklin Horton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-franklin-horton-v-state-texapp-2010.