Arnold Bernhard & Co. v. Finance Publishing Corp.

32 A.D.2d 516, 298 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4258
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 10, 1969·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order entered October 29, 1968, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants, and summary judgment granted to defendants dismissing the complaint. The subject article published in defendant’s magazine is not libelous per se; it imputes nothing evil to plaintiff, nor does it charge either negligence or incompetence, consisting, as it does, of the sardonic recital of what at worst might be considered a single instance of mistaken exercise of business judgment on plaintiff’s part, without any imputation of fraud, deceit or malpractice. Nothing pleaded justifies an inference of malice, nor are special damages alleged. In sum, the complaint does not allege a cause in libel by any applicable standard. Concur— Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold Bernhard & Co. v. Finance Publishing Corp., 32 A.D.2d 516, 298 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 516 (Arnold Bernhard & Co. v. Finance Publishing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaw v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
74 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Craig v. Moore
48 Fla. Supp. 29 (Duval County Circuit Court, 1978)
Bordoni v. New York Times Company, Inc.
400 F. Supp. 1223 (S.D. New York, 1975)