Arnold Anthony Mendez v. Linda Renee Mendez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 17, 2009
Docket13-09-00590-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Arnold Anthony Mendez v. Linda Renee Mendez (Arnold Anthony Mendez v. Linda Renee Mendez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold Anthony Mendez v. Linda Renee Mendez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-09-00590-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

ARNOLD ANTHONY MENDEZ, APPELLANT,



v.



LINDA RENEE MENDEZ , APPELLEE.

_____________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the 105th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Arnold Anthony Mendez, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against him in favor of appellee, Linda Renee Mendez. On October 29, 2009, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on October 12, 2009, and that the deputy district clerk, Arnold Garcia, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

On December 7, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent in remitting a $175.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court's notices and has failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed

the 17th day of December, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Arnold Anthony Mendez v. Linda Renee Mendez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-anthony-mendez-v-linda-renee-mendez-texapp-2009.