Arnhold v. Pyramid Management Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arnhold v. Pyramid Management Group, Inc.

260 A.D.2d 518, 688 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4105

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 518 (Arnhold v. Pyramid Management Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnhold v. Pyramid Management Group, Inc., 260 A.D.2d 518, 688 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered May 5, 1998, which granted the motion of the defendant Metzger Construction Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and (2) an order of the same court, entered May 8, 1998, which granted the motion of the defendants Pyramid Management Group, Inc., and Poughkeepsie Galleria Company Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The record indicates that the defendants lacked actual or constructive notice of the ice condition which allegedly caused the injured plaintiff to fall (see, Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972; Davis v City of New York, 255 AD2d 356; Bertman v Board of Mgrs., 233 AD2d 283). Further, Metzger Construction Corp. owed no duty to the injured plaintiff by virtue of its contractual duty to remove snow and ice from the subject premises (see, DeCurtis v T. H. Assocs., 241 AD2d 536, 537). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered May 5, 1998, which granted the motion of the defendant Metzger Construction Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and (2) an order of the same court, entered May 8, 1998, which granted the motion of the defendants Pyramid Management Group, Inc., and Poughkeepsie Galleria Company Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The record indicates that the defendants lacked actual or constructive notice of the ice condition which allegedly caused the injured plaintiff to fall (see, Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972; Davis v City of New York, 255 AD2d 356; Bertman v Board of Mgrs., 233 AD2d 283). Further, Metzger Construction Corp. owed no duty to the injured plaintiff by virtue of its contractual duty to remove snow and ice from the subject premises (see, DeCurtis v T. H. Assocs., 241 AD2d 536, 537). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 518, 688 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnhold-v-pyramid-management-group-inc-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack