Arnetta Garner Horn High v. Henry Dave Rogers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Arnetta Garner Horn High v. Henry Dave Rogers

DecidedMay 11, 2005

Docket12-05-00091-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Arnetta Garner Horn High v. Henry Dave Rogers (Arnetta Garner Horn High v. Henry Dave Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnetta Garner Horn High v. Henry Dave Rogers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-05-00091-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ARNETTA GARNER HORN HIGH, § APPEAL FROM THE SECOND

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

HENRY DAVE ROGERS,

APPELLEE § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant perfected her appeal on October 21, 2004. Thereafter, the clerk’s record was filed on March 22, 2005, making Appellant’s brief due on or before April 21, 2005. When Appellant failed to file her brief within the required time, this Court notified her on April 27, 2005 that the brief was past due and warned that if no motion for extension of time to file the brief were received by May 9, 2005 the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b). The notice further informed Appellant that the motion for extension of time must contain a reasonable explanation for her failure to file the brief and a showing that Appellee had not suffered material injury thereby.

To date, Appellant has not responded to or complied with this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Opinion delivered May 11, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-05-00091-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ARNETTA GARNER HORN HIGH, § APPEAL FROM THE SECOND

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

HENRY DAVE ROGERS,

APPELLEE § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant perfected her appeal on October 21, 2004. Thereafter, the clerk’s record was filed on March 22, 2005, making Appellant’s brief due on or before April 21, 2005. When Appellant failed to file her brief within the required time, this Court notified her on April 27, 2005 that the brief was past due and warned that if no motion for extension of time to file the brief were received by May 9, 2005 the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b). The notice further informed Appellant that the motion for extension of time must contain a reasonable explanation for her failure to file the brief and a showing that Appellee had not suffered material injury thereby.

To date, Appellant has not responded to or complied with this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Opinion delivered May 11, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Arnetta Garner Horn High v. Henry Dave Rogers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnetta-garner-horn-high-v-henry-dave-rogers-texapp-2005.