Arnett v. Hensley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Arnett v. Hensley

273 S.W.2d 816, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 1203

DecidedDecember 17, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 273 S.W.2d 816 (Arnett v. Hensley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnett v. Hensley, 273 S.W.2d 816, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 1203 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming .the $600 judgment in favor of the appellee because we think (1) the question of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence was for the jury; and (2) the instruction objected to. was not improper, [817]*817in view of the positive testimony' of' the-officers who measured the visibility distance at-the curve: where the accident occurred, and which made KRS 189.400 ap-’ plicable to the case.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment .is |ffirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming .the $600 judgment in favor of the appellee because we think (1) the question of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence was for the jury; and (2) the instruction objected to. was not improper, [817]*817in view of the positive testimony' of' the-officers who measured the visibility distance at-the curve: where the accident occurred, and which made KRS 189.400 ap-’ plicable to the case.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment .is |ffirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 S.W.2d 816, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 1203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnett-v-hensley-kyctapp-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack