Arnett v. Grant

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2005
Docket04-2044
StatusUnpublished

This text of Arnett v. Grant (Arnett v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnett v. Grant, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2044

ORVILLE ARNETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RAPHAEL J. GRANT,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY; ANTHONY M. MILEO; WAYNE CURRY, County Executive for Prince George’s County, Maryland,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-3861-AW)

Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 23, 2005

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orville Arnett, Appellant Pro Se. Krystal Quinn Alves, Kristin Marie Hileman Adams, OFFICE OF LAW FOR PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Orville Arnett appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this action arising out of Arnett’s arrest. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Arnett v.

Grant, No. CA-02-3861-AW (D. Md. filed July 29, 2004; entered

July 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Arnett v. Grant, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnett-v-grant-ca4-2005.