Arnett v. Glenn

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Arnett v. Glenn

52 Ark. 253

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 253 (Arnett v. Glenn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnett v. Glenn, 52 Ark. 253 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

.Husband and wife. If the husband held the note with the express authority to collect it, he could only have made such collection as would inure to the benefit of his wife. He could not accept in its payment, the satisfaction of his own debt without proof that the wife gave her assent, cither express or implied, to this misuse of her funds. Williams v. Johnston, 92 N. C., 532; Belton Compress Co. v. Belton Brick Co., 64 Texas, 337.

There was no proof that Mrs. Arnett ever authorized such conduqt. The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

.Husband and wife. If the husband held the note with the express authority to collect it, he could only have made such collection as would inure to the benefit of his wife. He could not accept in its payment, the satisfaction of his own debt without proof that the wife gave her assent, cither express or implied, to this misuse of her funds. Williams v. Johnston, 92 N. C., 532; Belton Compress Co. v. Belton Brick Co., 64 Texas, 337.

There was no proof that Mrs. Arnett ever authorized such conduqt. The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Ark. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnett-v-glenn-ark-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack